Celebrating a Unified Voice for Water Reuse

By Don Vandertulip, WEF Chair, Water Reuse Committee

As WEFTEC.09 and the WateReuse conferences approach, reclaimed water and water utility professionals can celebrate the unique relationship enjoyed between the Water Environment Federation (WEF) and the WateReuse Association (WRA). Why celebrate? Because this special relationship directly and positively impacts the planet’s sustainable water resources. Both organizations direct attention to reclamation and other beneficial uses of the high quality water now produced from what years ago was called a sewer plant. Among other activities, they are working together in research projects and developing an alternative to plumbing code requirements for purple pipe that carries untreated wastewater.

Results also include expanded opportunities to learn and grow professionally. In fact, WEF and WRA are both supporting sessions to begin discussion of potential updates to the EPA Guidelines for Water Reuse at their respective national conferences. WEF is also a co-sponsor for the WRA Symposium to be held in Seattle September 13-16, 2009 and encourages its members and water professionals to attend the conference and become immersed in water reuse topics. If you can’t attend this west coast conference, remember that WEFTEC will be October 10-14 in Orlando.

WEF Water Reuse Committee members already know and appreciate that many WEF members are also members of WRA. We believe this co-participation reinforces our knowledge base and supports a unified voice for expanded reuse of water. And that unified voice bodes well for clean water.

From World Water Week: Thoughts on the SJWP

By Bjorn von Euler, Director of Philanthropy, ITT Corporation

A number of innovations were highlighted at the Stockholm World Water Week event, some of them the result of corporate prizes. But I’ll talk about the prize closest to my heart - the Stockholm Junior Water Prize (full disclosure: the global sponsor is ITT).

Eighteen-year-old Ceren Burçak Dag, of Nisantasi, Turkey, won the prize for one of the coolest projects I’ve seen (of course, I say that every year): Dag’s research may show us a way to harness rainwater to produce electricity. Seeing Dag on stage, along with the 50 other young nominees from 29 countries, was both moving and inspiring.

Some of the other projects were as follows: Eileen Jang, of North Carolina and the U.S. winner, figured out how mercury builds in our water, which promises to help us better understand how it enters the human body. Mzwakhe Sifundo Xulu and Njabubulo Sihle Mbata, of South Africa, developed an inexpensive Auto Mechanical Tap that captures water from community faucets that would normally be wasted due to spillage. This promises to be a valuable tool for rural, arid communities, including their native South Africa.

One of the memories I will take away from this year’s Junior Prize is standing in front of one young nominee’s project and telling him it was very good. “Do you mean brilliant?” he said. I could only smile in response, so let me answer him now - yes, I meant brilliant.

Moments like these with aspiring young researchers remind me of why it’s so important to encourage innovation and creativity in water science. Brilliance is what we need to address today’s water quality challenges, and we saw it in Stockholm last week.

Thoughts on Katrina and Heroes

By Adam Zabinski, 2008-2009 Immediate Past President of the Water Environment Federation (WEF)

The upcoming August 29 anniversary of Hurricane Katrina seems to always gets people thinking and talking (or in my case, blogging). Among the many things it’s come to symbolize, like failure of government emergency response, Katrina will always be a tragic reminder to me of the vulnerability of our water resources and the critical nature of the work we do as water quality professionals. I’m sure I’m not alone in remembering news accounts of individuals who did their best to keep their facilities operating under the most extreme circumstances, sometimes staying on the job while surrounded by flood waters in New Orleans. I was in awe of those heroic efforts and proud to be involved in water quality protection, and I salute everyone who worked to maintain the availability and safety of water during that difficult time. (In fact, please feel to share names and stories of “Katrina Water Heroes” by responding to this blog; I’m sure everyone would enjoy hearing about them.)

While we have fortunately not faced an environmental calamity on Katrina’s scale since then, there is still a huge, essential, and ongoing challenge to preserve and protect our water resources. It’s a job that demands real commitment and a genuine desire to protect public health and the environment through clean water. It is also a job that is done every day by members of the Water Environment Federation. We protect our families, our neighbors, and people we will never meet from the dreaded water borne diseases that are the scourge of most of our planet. Katrina symbolizes our achievement because even in those opportune conditions, we had no outbreaks.

I’d invite you to take a moment to read through some of the personal statements from our own WEF Water Heroes, water quality professionals who are working hard to keep our water clean and safe—all day every day. While (thankfully) there are no major wet weather events occurring on a regular basis, professionals in facilities across our country and around the world are ready. And they’re operating water and wastewater facilities to protect and deliver clean water, 24/7, every day. I’d call that heroic, too.

New TMDL Rulings Give Them Something to Talk About

By Brooks Smith, Hunton & Williams LLP

The raging national dialogue on TMDLs moves into high gear next week in Minneapolis during TMDL 2009: Combining Science and Management to Restore Impaired Waters in Minneapolis. If you’re not a water quality junkie, stop here. If you are, you’ll be thrilled to hear that the comprehensive program includes scientists talking about new research like model development and advancements in water quality monitoring and evolving tools to implement effective TMDLs. Perhaps even better, representatives from source, nonpoint source, regulator, permittee, and environmental interests, and maybe even your next-door neighbor, will be there, and we expect lots of talk about the latest court rulings and what they mean for the nation’s watersheds.

Two new and controversial TMDL rulings, if widely applied, have the potential to turn the world of watershed management upside down. The first is from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the so-called Pinto Creek case, which deals with what to do with permits for new dischargers after a TMDL is in place. According to the Ninth Circuit, such permits may not be issued, even if they require offsets of equivalent or greater reductions in loading beyond existing conditions, unless and until all other regulated dischargers (and maybe even unregulated ones!) are subject to enforceable schedules of compliance to achieve their own allocations.

Anyone want to opine on what this will do to the pace of new permitting across the country? Egads!

The second is from a Vermont environmental court and deals with older TMDLs that have already been on the books for a few years. According to the court, these TMDLs may not control subsequent permit proceedings and may actually need to be re-evaluated as part of each proceeding to ensure that the original assumptions remain accurate. Let’s see, we have something like 60,000 TMDLs left to do around the country. And now we cannot even rely on the ones already in place! Read: budget, administrative and regulatory nightmare. There has got to be a better way to figure this out, so please go ahead and post some ideas! Meanwhile I hope to see you in Minneapolis.